Class action launched against Crown by shareholders

by Charlotte Lee Last Updated
Crown?s Victorian royal commission gets underway

A class action lawsuit by some of Crown Resorts’ shareholders alleges investors were misled and harmed by the casino’s possible breaches of anti-money laundering laws.

The Sydney Morning Herald reports that on October 19, shares in Crown Resorts dropped eight per cent, wiping $500 million off Crown’s market value, when it was revealed that financial crimes watchdog AUSTRAC launched an enforcement investigation into breaches of anti-money laundering laws at its Melbourne casino.

Law firm Maurice Blackburn lodged a claim in the Victorian Supreme Court last Friday, accusing Crown of engaging in misleading or deceptive conduct from December 2014 to October 2020 by telling investors it had “robust” or effective controls in place to ensure compliance with anti-money laundering laws.

The firm also alleges Crown acted contrary to its shareholders’ interests and, in a novel legal approach, will ask the court to consider ordering Crown to buy back shares from affected investors.

Crown declined to comment.

Maurice Blackburn is already pursuing Crown through the Federal Court seeking millions of dollars for shareholders who lost money in a $1.3 billion share price crash after 19 Crown employees were arrested for gambling crimes in China in 2016.

That case is set to go to trial in 2022.

Crown rocked by NSW inquiry

Crown has been rocked by the New South Wales Independent Liquor and Gaming Authority inquiry into the group, which has revealed among other things, a systemic failure to prevent money laundering at its Melbourne and Perth casinos and in patron back accounts.

The lawyer running the case, Maurice Blackburn class actions principal Miranda Nagy, said shareholders would have expected Crown to have best-practice compliance with anti-money laundering regulation, especially since the group claimed publicly to take those obligations seriously.

“Instead it appears Crown’s systems left the company potentially exposed to criminal activity happening on its premises and through its bank accounts,” Ms Nagy said.

“We believe these governance failures have caused real loss to shareholders.”

The class action’s lead plaintiff, Greg Lieberman, said he thought he was buying shares in a responsible and well governed company, not a ‘cowboy outfit’.

AUSTRAC identified its concerns about Crown during a compliance assessment launched in September 2019 looking at Crown Melbourne’s management of customers’ “identified as high risk and politically exposed persons.”

That assessment came shortly after a report that revealed some of Crown’s most important high-roller “junket” tour partners were linked to powerful Asian criminal syndicates and money launderers, triggering the NSW inquiry.

The ILGA inquiry was launched in August and held 60 days of public hearings, which concluded last month, but Crown waited until the last week of the probe before conceding that more probably than not, money laundering had occurred in its bank accounts.

Maurice Blackburn will likely use evidence from the inquiry to support its claim, including that Crown did not give its directors or senior executives anti-money laundering training until this year, and that it did not document how it assessed its junket partners for criminal links.

In November, the NSW gambling regulator ordered Crown to delay opening its new Sydney casino, which was to commence operations before Christmas, until the inquiry hands down its findings in January on whether Crown is fit to hold a casino licence in the state.

Counsels assisting the inquiry submitted to Commissioner Patricia Bergin that Crown’s relationships with junkets linked to organised crime, the risks it took in China, its failures to prevent money laundering and major shareholder James Packer’s “deleterious” influence over corporate governance were all reasons why it should be found to be an unsuitable licence holder.

Back to top